Stiftung Warentest undergoes a rapid test Google’s new pixel smartphones. The reviewers find no major weaknesses, but are also better than the devices iPhone 7 plus or the Galaxy S7?
The new Google powered mobile phone have no longer managed in the latest issue of the magazine “Test” and the current leaderboard.Stiftung Warentest now supplies a quick test of the Pixel duo.
Processing and design, the Auditors have nothing. On the contrary, they find the pixel shells noble and robust, the drop test could do any harm to the Google smartphones. Positive, Stiftung Warentest also assessed that the devices with the new Android 7.1 are delivered and Google security updates and major updates to promptly deliver the devices.
Google’s wizard that is integrated on the pixels for the first time in the system, can the testers still little start with: “well, the wizard detects the German language and some commands can be used meaningfully.As soon as the user but tries to do something more complicated settings using voice commands, he often ends up in the wrong place.As for language assistants, the requests to Web servers are evaluated. Google learns so what have queried users via voice command.”
“Camera For Snapshots”
The examiner would want to sign “the best Smartphone camera in the world”, Google’s statement, the pixel smartphones. The devices made while “ordinary images”. Compared to the iPhone 7 plus or they could keep the Samsung Galaxy S7 but not quite, they write. “Especially in low light noise is evident. The pixel units does not provide an optical image stabilizer. Also videos succeed only on average. Thanks to very fast shutter lag the cameras of both devices are suitable but for snapshots.”
“Good values” reached the pixel-duo in the battery test, must give up but again less than the Galaxy S7. 15 minutes to the socket XL range the pixel for a charging stand from 17 percent, with the smaller device even for 20 minutes. Fully loaded the pixels according to the test report in the rapid test using”regular” hours, last 23.5 hours that pixel XL. Those are “Ordinary values, but less than for example the 24.5 hours at the Samsung Galaxy S7.”
“Expensive And Unspectacular”
The prices of Google smartphones is “proud” Stiftung Warentest. The 5.5-inch device pixel XL will cost around 900 euros, with 128 gigabytes in the 32-gigabyte version 1010 euro. The pixels with 5-inch display is slightly cheaper with 760 euros (32 gigabytes) or 870 euros (128 GB).
Bottom line the auditor consider Google’s Smartphone no “flagship-killer”, that they were “expensive and unspectacular.” So could the pixel while “in price with the champions of the competition from Samsung, Apple and co. keep up.” You are worse than the Samsung Galaxy S7 or the Apple a tick but iPhone 7 plus.”
Wie gut sind Pixel und Pixel XL?: Warentest beurteilt …
Stiftung Warentest testet Smartphones, Galaxy Note und …
Apple vs. Google: Die Smartphone-Flaggschiffe Pixel 2 …
Stiftung Warentest: Bestes Smartphone 2016. Das Galaxy S5 …
HTC Hero smartphone judged best gadget of 2009
Stiftung Warentest 5/2016 – Die nächste Generation der …
Don’t judge this One by its cover
Die besten Smartphones bei Stiftung Warentest
Huawei stark bei Warentest: Galaxy S7 besser als iPhone 7 …
Stiftung Warentest 02/14: 19 neue Smartphone im Vergleichstest
Judge Dismisses Apple vs. Google Smartphone Patent Case
Gute Smartphones schon ab 100 Euro: Warentest kürt Preis …
Stiftung Warentest: Top-Android- und Windows-Smartphones …
Pixel und Pixel XL
n-tv Ratgeber: Apple, Samsung, ZTE oder Google: Welche …
Keeping the same phone for two years
Apple v. Samsung: US judge grants injunction on Galaxy …
Karten: Google Maps wieder auf iPhone und iPad
Diese Smartphone-Hersteller liefern laut Stiftung …
Apple Vs Google: Samsung Galaxy Nexus May See The Light Of …